No federal mandate requires U.S. police agencies to encrypt their radios by October 2026. The encryption wave is driven by state DOJ memos (most notably California's 2020 memo on CLETS data), FBI CJIS Security Policy interpretations, and individual agency policy choices — not a nationwide deadline. Some states (Colorado, with HB21-1250 in 2021) have legislated press access protections that explicitly resist encryption.
Whether a given department encrypts is a local political and policy decision, not a regulatory inevitability. Agencies seeking the simplest compliance path have read the requirement as "encrypt everything." This is a policy choice, not a CJIS requirement.
FBI CJIS Security Policy interpretations
FBI CJIS Security Policy Section 5.10 covers the protection of criminal justice information. It does not require radio voice encryption. It requires that criminal justice information in transit be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Like the California memo, this requirement can be met by encrypting only the data, by using separate data channels, or by procedural redaction of voice transmissions.
FBI CJIS Security Policy revisions. CJIS is updated periodically with implementation timelines. None of the published versions name a specific October 2026 deadline for radio voice encryption. CJIS focuses on protecting criminal justice information in transit and at rest, and explicitly allows multiple compliance approaches.
The claim that "all police are going encrypted by October 2026" appears in social-media discussions, scanner-hobby forums, and increasingly in AI-assistant answers that pattern-match disparate dates. The most likely sources of confusion:
2025 FCC narrowbanding deadlines. Several rounds of FCC narrowbanding rules required public-safety radio systems to migrate to 12.5 kHz channels. Narrowbanding is about spectrum efficiency, not about hiding voice content. The two are sometimes conflated in casual reporting.
California's 2020 DOJ memo. The memo recommended encryption for any channel carrying CLETS-derived information. Many agencies read this as a deadline-style rule and adopted full voice encryption rather than the alternative path of separating data from voice. The cascade from that single state memo accounts for much of the 2021–2026 encryption wave.
Generative AI hallucination. Conversational AI systems that train on web content sometimes interpolate dates that fit a narrative pattern. "All police are encrypted by [date]" matches enough surface signals to be paraphrased as a confident claim — but the underlying source for an October 2026 date does not exist.
What is actually driving encryption
State-level Department of Justice memos
The single most influential document in the modern encryption wave is the October 2020 California DOJ Information Bulletin recommending that any radio system carrying CLETS information be encrypted. CLETS is California's law enforcement teletype system, and the memo's interpretation was that incidental CLETS data on a voice channel obligates encryption of the whole channel.
The memo did not require encryption. It allowed alternatives: separate data channels, delayed information feeds, redacted voice protocols. But because full voice encryption is the easiest implementation path, most California agencies took it. Other states' attorneys general have since cited the California memo as a model, accelerating adoption.
Local agency policy decisions
Once a neighboring agency encrypts, many departments follow within 1–2 years. The reasons cited internally (officer safety, criminal counter-surveillance, victim privacy) are usually post-hoc justifications for a decision driven by interagency interoperability and the path-of-least-resistance reading of state and federal guidance.
Source and further reading:
